Main Page

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Revision as of 11:34, 12 October 2007 by JWSchneider (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Antitrust World Reports by Professor Keith N. Hylton

Widely recognized in the areas of law and economics, Keith Hylton has published numerous articles in American law journals and peer-reviewed law and economics journals. His textbook, Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2003.

Professor Hylton joined the BU Law faculty in 1995 after teaching for six years and receiving tenure at Northwestern University School of Law. At BU Law, he teaches courses in antitrust, torts and labor law (view full faculty profile).

Research Assistants

Suggested Citation Format

[Signal] Keith N. Hylton et al., [article/page/report name], Antitrust World Reports, available at [URL location] [(optional other parenthetical)] (as of [date], [time] GMT).


Examples

  • Keith N. Hylton et al., Country Report: Romania (December 10, 2003), Antitrust World Reports, available at http://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php/Romania_%28December_10%2C_2003%29 (noting Romania's ban on tying) (as of October 10, 2007, 05:30 PM GMT).
  • See Keith N. Hylton et al., Predatory Pricing Report, Antitrust World Reports, available at http://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php/Predatory_Pricing_Report (as of September 5, 2007, 12:30 AM GMT).

Notice on Accuracy of Data

AntitrustWorldWiki.com is a unique research tool. It is designed not for formal publication, but as a means to methodically draw-out factual information regarding the ever-changing body of international competition law. The authors assert only that the data on these pages is accurate to the best of their knowledge. Any outside expertise on a particular jurisdiction's formal law, or extent of enforcement, is readily welcomed and encouraged by the authors.


Databases Notes

Special Reports

Country Reports

The following data represents a comprehensive survey of current antitrust regimes throughout the world. The original texts of individual statutes in each country were examined for the presence of various elements. Each included country receives an individual report here that indicates the presence or absence of these various elements in the country’s statutes. The presence of an element is accompanied by a short explanation and/or citation to the applicable statute. The elements themselves are defined here. Some definitions are broad and could be divided into subcategories, in these cases, detailed comments are provided. Each report also includes a numerical score for comparison across countries and regions, or for empirical analysis.

Europe: European Union
Austria Belgium Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia
Finland France Germany Greece Greenland Hungary
Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta
Netherlands Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain
Sweden United Kingdom


Europe: Non-European Union
Albania Armenia Belarus Bosnia-Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia
Faroe Island Georgia Iceland Jersey, Channel Islands Macedonia Moldova
Norway Romania Russia Serbia-Montenegro Switzerland Turkey
Ukraine Yugoslavia/Serbia


Africa
Angola Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Cote d'Ivoire Kenya
Malawi Mali Mauritius Namibia Nigeria Senegal
South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe


Middle East and Northern Africa
Algeria Egypt Iran Israel Jordan Morocco
Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria Tunisia


South America
Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Guyana
Paraguay Peru Uruguay Venezuela


Central America
Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Mexico Nicaragua
Panama


North America
Canada United States


Caribbean
Barbados Dominican Republic Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago


Asia
Azerbaijan Bangladesh Cambodia China Hong Kong India
Indonesia Japan Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR
Mongolia Pakistan Philippines Singapore Sri Lanka Taiwan
Tajikistan Thailand Uzbekistan Vietnam


Oceania
Australia Fiji New Zealand Papua New Guinea